May 2026

Parliamentary appearance by Catherine Atkinson

Jessica Morden voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Parliamentary appearance by Catherine Atkinson

Parliamentary appearance by Catherine Atkinson

Parliamentary appearance by Catherine Atkinson

Parliamentary appearance by Freddie van Mierlo

Ellie Reeves voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Liz Twist voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

I welcome last week’s King’s Speech and the Bills in it, which aim to put the UK on a stronger path for the future. My constituents have been clear with me: if we are to build a future that is fairer, in which they are not just getting by, but thriving, we need to do politics differently. It is not good enough to suggest that someday in the distant future things might get a little bit better. That is not going to cut it any more. Today our focus is on energy security, an issue that underscores p

Josh Newbury voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Coalminers were the original victims of an unjust transition and, 40 years on, the Grangemouth oil refinery workers are the modern-day equivalent. PetroChina, the Chinese state-owned petrochemical company, and Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Ineos ended a century of Scottish oil refining because they—a foreign Government and private capital—wanted to make even more money. The closure meant: 435 jobs on site—redundant; 2,822 supply chain jobs—gone; local businesses, which needed refinery workers’ custom— ham

The Secretary of State claims that he is leading a moral crusade, but he is simply exporting emissions. It is like saying, “Lord, I will not sin, but I am quite happy for people to sin on my behalf.”

Matt Western voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Bambos Charalambous voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Stephanie Peacock voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Preet Kaur Gill voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Gareth Snell voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Many farmers, small businesses and residents have had access to their properties disrupted by the construction of HS2. The Wilcoxes in my constituency have been battling for more than five years to get a simple deed of easement to guarantee access to their property. As a former property lawyer, I know that is a very simple document that should have been agreed; without it, properties become unmortgageable and unsellable. Will the Secretary of State set out what steps she is taking to ensure that

No, I must make some progress. I do apologise. I should have thought that we could have a compromise on this. We could have a policy that is sensible, gradually moving away from fossil fuels and gradually becoming a more green-energy economy, but we should not simply export our emissions and set arbitrary dates. As this is a debate on the King’s Speech, I hope you will you forgive me, Madam Deputy Speaker, if I mention another subject in the short time available to me. When you get to my age, yo

My hon. Friend is very well respected in his area for the fantastic amount of work that he has done in Scunthorpe. He is constantly holding the Government to account, and indeed working with the Government. We have to do this together to protect our steelmaking capacity, for the sake of our industrial wealth. I agree—we all agree—that the energy independence Bill provides a framework for transitioning the UK energy market away from fossil fuels and towards alternative forms of energy. We have no