May 2026

Darren Paffey voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Jim Dickson voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

After the increase to the time limit, I think I will buy a lottery ticket tonight, Madam Deputy Speaker. Having worked in energy, I am all too aware that it has not always been high on the political agenda, but since the invasion of Ukraine, it has of course seized the headlines, and it is in the news once again because of President Trump’s distraction plan in Iran. I welcome the Government’s focus on energy security, but I hope that we will not narrow our view of what energy security and clean

Lauren Sullivan voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

I am sure it has not missed anybody’s radar that I recently launched a campaign for lifelong sex education, and last week I met some parish councillors, one of whom works in the Probation Service. She thanked me for the campaign because of the amount of re-education they have to do, particularly for young men, on what is acceptable within sexual relationships. Will the Secretary of State, or a relevant Minister, meet me to talk about the importance of lifelong sex education in re-educating poten

Iqbal Mohamed voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Yuan Yang voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Mike Tapp voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Katie White voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Jeevun Sandher voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Rachel Blake voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Michelle Welsh voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Parliamentary appearance by Jonathan Davies

Jonathan Davies voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Alison Hume voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

Richard Baker voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

As an MP whose constituency has a category C prison for male sex offenders that is almost at capacity—HMP Littlehey—I welcome the clarity from the Minister regarding paedophiles in the prison estate. We know that the Minister is on the hook to deliver thousands of new category C and D prison places. I want to ask him about the prison places he has made almost no progress on since the election because the contractor ISG went into administration in September 2024. I first highlighted the failure o

Jeremy Wright voted AYE on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)

The truth of the matter is that despite spending over £103 billion of taxpayers’ money, my son has laid more rail track from his Lego set than the previous Government did under the HS2 programme. But seriously, whistleblowers have alleged that costs were deliberately hidden from Parliament, documents were shredded and staff who spoke out were sacked. Before another penny is spent by the British taxpayer, how will the Secretary of State ensure that in the future there are accountable binding mech

The House gave the Government a clear instruction that the only documents that could be redacted were those that might prejudice UK national security or international relations, and all those documents were to be referred to the Intelligence and Security Committee, so for my incredibly respected right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Kenilworth and Southam (Sir Jeremy Wright) to say that the Government have applied redactions to documents sent to the ISC, beyond the scope agreed by the Hou