BB
647 MPs·389 Bills·£2.9T

May 2026

Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat

All Events — May 2026(8124 total, page 345 of 407)

🗳️
Martin RhodesvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Martin Rhodes voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Dr Ellie ChownsvoteGreen Party
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Ellie Chowns voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Luke MurphyvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Luke Murphy voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Dr Neil HudsonvoteConservative
Voted AYE on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Neil Hudson voted AYE on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🎤
Patrick HurleyspeechLabour
Victims Code
In my constituency, an acknowledged victim of violent crime is being alleged to be contributorily negligent in the civil courts. That is retraumatising, and appears to be contrary to natural justice. Will the Minister meet me and my constituents to discuss this further, and see what measures can be put in place to address concerns about how the civil law system deals with such cases?
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Sojan JosephvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Sojan Joseph voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Torcuil Crichton voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🎤
Patrick HurleyspeechLabour
Victims Code
9. What progress his Department has made on a new victims code.
Tue 19 May
🎤
Dr Rupa HuqspeechLabour
High Speed 2: Impact on Communities
I also have fond memories of Cheryl Gillan, who I stood against in 2005. The hon. Lady knows my seat well, and the things she describes have a lot of resonance with Wells House Road, NW10, which I think is the most blighted road in England. An email from a resident there today said: “We were told to expect six years of disruption. Now they are asking us to live with 16.” They point out that while the cost of HS2 has tripled, the community funds have not. Buckinghamshire is a recipient, as is Eus
Tue 19 May
🎤
Dr Rupa HuqspeechLabour
High Speed 2 Reset
I welcome the honesty and clarity, after years of sitting opposite the Conservatives and not knowing whether HS2 was happening at all, or where it would start and stop—it was going to be a Y-shape in the beginning. This is good news, in a way. I echo the praise for Mark Wild, who has met with my residents, and for Lord Hendy in the other place. However, for my residents in Old Oak Common—this fabled area that was once going to be the terminus—the ever-lengthening timeline is disappointing. Will
Tue 19 May
📍
Dave RobertsonappearanceLabour
Spoke in debate: High Speed 2: Impact on Communities
Parliamentary appearance by Dave Robertson
Tue 19 May
📍
Dave RobertsonappearanceLabour
Spoke in debate: High Speed 2 Reset
Parliamentary appearance by Dave Robertson
Tue 19 May
🎤
Shockat AdamspeechIndependent
Lord Mandelson: Government Response to Humble Address
In 2021, the Prime Minister wrote an essay in which he said, “Where the current Tory government has muddied the waters of transparency…I want to make it easier to hold government to account.” He said that a Labour Government must “play its role in restoring honesty, decency and transparency in public life”— and yet here we are. Does the Minister agree that after all the redacting of messages, it is not only the Labour party that is being damaged, but democracy itself?
Tue 19 May
📍
Mr David LammyappearanceLabour
Spoke in debate: Jury Trial Proposals
Parliamentary appearance by Mr David Lammy
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Jas AthwalvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Jas Athwal voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Chris MurrayvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Chris Murray voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Chris HinchliffvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Chris Hinchliff voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Joe PowellvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Joe Powell voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Warinder JussvoteLabour
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Warinder Juss voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
📍
Mr David LammyappearanceLabour
Spoke in debate: Family Courts
Parliamentary appearance by Mr David Lammy
Tue 19 May