Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
🗳️
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Connor Naismith voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
📍
Spoke in debate: Lord Mandelson: Government Response to Humble Address
Parliamentary appearance by Aphra Brandreth
Tue 19 May
📍
Spoke in debate: Energy Security
Parliamentary appearance by Sir John Hayes
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Rebecca Long Bailey voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Douglas McAllister voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
📍
Spoke in debate: Energy Security
Parliamentary appearance by Claire Coutinho
Tue 19 May
🎤
Topical Questions
Sexual assaults and harassment on trains have risen by more than a third over the past 10 years, yet too many trains and stations still lack adequate CCTV. That evidence gap lets criminals evade justice and fails victims. What steps are the Secretary of State and his colleagues taking to improve CCTV coverage across the whole rail network, so that perpetrators of violence against women and girls can be brought to justice?
Tue 19 May
🎤
High Speed 2 Reset
It is not true to say that Wales is getting nothing. At the spending review last year we announced £445 million in direct funding to modernise and upgrade Welsh rail, and only a couple of months ago, in February, the UK Government, with the former Welsh Government, announced a long-term pipeline of rail enhancements that could total up to £14 billion. I would be happy to discuss rail enhancements with the new leadership of the Senedd, and I look forward to having a constructive working relations
Tue 19 May
🎤
Energy Security
It is a privilege to close this debate on the Gracious Speech. It has been a pleasure to sit here all afternoon and listen to all the contributions in what turned out to be a far more wide-ranging debate than one just on energy policy, and I thank all Members for that. I will respond to a few specific points raised in the debate in due course, although I will single out a few contributions from Members on the Labour Benches at the outset. My hon. Friend the Member for Chesterfield (Mr Perkins) w
Tue 19 May
🎤
Energy Security
I will make a bit of progress. Where the House diverges is on how we respond to that shock. For Members on the Labour Benches, the overriding lesson from both Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the present crisis in the middle east is that every day we spend exposed to fossil fuels, which we can never control, is another day of insecurity. It is another day of being buffeted by conflicts that we had no part in starting, and of working people opening their energy bills and finding the cost of someo
Tue 19 May
🎤
Energy Security
I say that the Scottish National party’s plan for independence for energy was the flimsiest of flimsy documents. It had no plan for how independence would bring down bills, because the truth of the matter is that independence would tear apart any argument on energy security and drive up bills for people right across Scotland. That is why people rejected it in the referendum 10 years ago. The Tories and their former friends and colleagues now sitting on the Reform Benches want to solve a dependen
Tue 19 May
🎤
Energy Security
We are consulting on the future of gas storage. I have made it my policy to meet every MP who wants to meet me, and I have always had—[Interruption.] The shadow Minister says, “Even him?” I have always had very good conversations with the right hon. Member for Beverley and Holderness (Graham Stuart). He is in the wrong party—they all hate him. [Laughter.] Now is not the time to look away from the biggest long-term threat we face: climate change. It is a threat that we can no longer ignore, so we
Tue 19 May
🎤
Energy Security
I will come to jobs in the North sea in just a moment—a section of my speech is about that, given its importance. I have to say that I am absolutely incredulous: I can almost understand it from the Tories—thinking that a moment of windfall profits was the moment to cut taxes on oil and gas companies—but now we have a partnership of the SNP and the Tories who believe that now is the moment not to help people with their energy bills but to cut taxes for the biggest companies. That is an interestin
Tue 19 May
🎤
Energy Security
I do not have time; I am sorry. That system is already taking shape, whether through nuclear engineers in Ynys Môn following in their parents’ footsteps, apprentices learning to weld in the Aberdeen energy transition zone or wind turbine blades being forged in Hull—tens of thousands of jobs, record investment, real communities, real wages and a real future. The North sea made Britain an energy nation; the Bill ensures that it will remain one. Sometimes, in the noise of this place, we lose sight
Tue 19 May
📍
Spoke in debate: Family Court: Harassment of Domestic Abuse Victims
Parliamentary appearance by Rachel Gilmour
Tue 19 May
🎤
High Speed 2 Reset
The hon. Gentleman would expect me to have comprehensive discussions with my colleagues in the Treasury before announcing rail enhancements, and that is what we have done over the past couple of months, whether about Northern Powerhouse Rail—we set out those really ambitious plans at the start of the year—or indeed the anticipated profile of expenditure required over the next 10 years. I assure him that nothing I have announced today changes what I announced in January on Northern Powerhouse Rai
Tue 19 May
🎤
Lord Mandelson: Government Response to Humble Address
Does the Minister recognise just how damning it is of the Government’s lack of regard for transparency and accountability that the ISC finds itself in the position of having to publicly condemn their actions?
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Voted AYE on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Greg Smith voted AYE on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
📍
Spoke in debate: Energy Security
Parliamentary appearance by Bill Esterson
Tue 19 May
🗳️
Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)
Sonia Kumar voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (i)' (108-323, defeated)
Tue 19 May
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407