BB
647 MPs·389 Bills·£2.9T
Dame Harriett Baldwin

Dame Harriett Baldwin

Conservative

MP for West Worcestershire · Since 2010

36
Votes
6
Speeches
47
Total Events

Financial Snapshot

£6K
Gifts
View full register →

Recent Activity

Date:
🗳️

Voted AYE on: Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading

Harriett Baldwin voted AYE on 'Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading' (68-242, defeated)

21 May 2026AYEvia Commons Divisions API
🗳️

Voted AYE on: Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading

Harriett Baldwin voted AYE on 'Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading' (68-242, defeated)

21 May 2026AYEvia Commons Divisions API
🎤

Steel Strategy

I will carry on with the same theme, because it is clear from all sides that there are real issues with the element of the steel strategy that imposes a 50% tariff on 1 July. It is affecting manufacturing businesses up and down this country, and it is being done in a way that not only threatens manufacturing jobs, but increases inflationary pressures. Can the Minister tell the House what impact assessment he has done on the effect of these measures on inflation and on jobs?

21 May 2026via UK Parliament Hansard
📍

Spoke in debate: Costs for Motorists

Parliamentary appearance by Dame Harriett Baldwin

21 May 2026via Hansard
📍

Spoke in debate: Employment Rights Act 2025

Parliamentary appearance by Dame Harriett Baldwin

21 May 2026via Hansard
📍

Spoke in debate: Humble Address: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

Parliamentary appearance by Dame Harriett Baldwin

21 May 2026via Hansard
📍

Spoke in debate: Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Parliamentary appearance by Dame Harriett Baldwin

21 May 2026via Hansard
📍

Spoke in debate: Steel Strategy

Parliamentary appearance by Dame Harriett Baldwin

21 May 2026via Hansard
🎤

Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

I promised Madam Deputy Speaker that, in the interests of time, I would not take any interventions. This Bill is an emergency intervention with mounting public costs that have no clear limits for the taxpayer. This legislation will certainly not put things on a secure footing. We were told this time last year, when we were brought in on a Saturday for the first time since the Falklands war, that nationalisation was not the plan. The Prime Minister went to China with the Secretary of State and fa

21 May 2026via UK Parliament Hansard
🎤

Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

This has been an interesting debate, because it has brought out the strategic love of nationalisation for the sake of nationalisation among Government Members. With our reasoned amendment we have tried to put out a different approach. We also heard clearly from Reform that it is in favour of nationalisation for the sake of nationalisation. This Bill will satisfy neither our camp nor their camp. With this Bill, we have a chaotic, unplanned, non-strategic journey that will end up burning through t

21 May 2026via UK Parliament Hansard
🎤

Humble Address: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

I thank the Minister for advance sight of both the long and short versions of his statement. We support the Humble Address and continue to support full transparency in this matter. I have just a few questions. I think the Minister said that this is just the start of a full disclosure. Will he share with the House whether there will be further disclosure, or is this the final amount? If there are to be further tranches, will he give the House a clear and final timetable for when the process will

21 May 2026via UK Parliament Hansard
🎤

Costs for Motorists

Rural drivers in West Worcestershire will be delighted that the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has seen the political reality that it would have been mad to put another 5p on petrol on 1 September, but can she explain to my constituents why we are not allowing oil and gas extraction from our own basin yet we are allowing an increase in Putin-produced oil and gas?

21 May 2026via UK Parliament Hansard
🎤

Employment Rights Act 2025

The Employment Rights Act is one of the reasons given by one in eight business leaders for considering leaving Britain. Indeed, 30% of the Sunday Times rich list have already fled this high-tax socialist Government. The family business tax is another. Will the Minister please lobby the Chancellor for another U-turn, this time to adopt our policy of scrapping the family business tax?

21 May 2026via UK Parliament Hansard
🗳️

Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address

Harriett Baldwin voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address' (307-171, passed)

20 May 2026NOvia Commons Divisions API
🗳️

Voted AYE on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (p)

Harriett Baldwin voted AYE on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (p)' (104-316, defeated)

20 May 2026AYEvia Commons Divisions API
🗳️

Voted AYE on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (o)

Harriett Baldwin voted AYE on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (o)' (104-317, defeated)

20 May 2026AYEvia Commons Divisions API
🗳️

Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (l)

Harriett Baldwin voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (l)' (78-408, defeated)

20 May 2026NOvia Commons Divisions API
🗳️

Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (l)

Harriett Baldwin voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (l)' (78-408, defeated)

20 May 2026NOvia Commons Divisions API
🗳️

Voted AYE on: King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (o)

Harriett Baldwin voted AYE on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address: amendment (o)' (104-317, defeated)

20 May 2026AYEvia Commons Divisions API
🗳️

Voted NO on: King's Speech Motion for an Address

Harriett Baldwin voted NO on 'King's Speech Motion for an Address' (307-171, passed)

20 May 2026NOvia Commons Divisions API